Geoffrey Goodell on Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:22:08 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Should use mobile phone data to monitor public health |
Hi Ana, The problem with this proposal is that it focusses on the 'processing' of personal data, when the focus should be on the 'collection' of personal data instead. There is no way to prove that data, once collected, have not been used for malicious purposes or any purposes. There is no way to prove that data have not been exposed to malicious insiders, business partners, law enforcement, foreign governments, hackers, or indeed anyone. In this environment, both before and after COVID-19, the prevailing wisdom has been to 'collect all the data' with a justification that the benefits of 'serendipity' will outweigh the human costs and that it is a good idea to have the data 'just in case'. These arguments are dangerous and wrong. Any serious attempt to protect personal privacy must start with privacy by design, and the first principle of privacy by design is not to collect any data more than what is absolutely necessary to deliver a service. Best wishes -- Geoff On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 08:33:17PM +0100, Ana Peraica wrote: > > Hi all, just a quick note, <....> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: