| Stefan Heidenreich on Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:12:22 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> CfP: Critical reflections on pandemic politics: left-wing, feminist and anti-racist critiques |
Best Stefan Am 20.01.2022 um 16:54 schrieb Florian Cramer:
I feel there exists a distinct and problematic form of boundary policing from what identifies as 'the left' today, resulting inany critique of lockdowns and provax sentiment starting from left-wing values being too easily dismissed as 'right-wing.' A better critique of class in relation to all this is especially sorely missing. Hence my retort of 'knee-jerk.'The word "provax" itself is a propaganda framing, similar to framing evolution as 'just a theory' next to 'intelligent design', and a complete giveaway of your ideology; just as your list of research questions was, in its sum, rhetorical.Any critical discussion ends here. -F Cheers, Ingrid. Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Ana Teixeira Pinto <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:00:52 PM *To:* Hoofd, I.M. (Ingrid) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Subject:* Re: <nettime> CfP: Critical reflections on pandemic politics: left-wing, feminist and anti-racist critiques I would not call Florian's response a knee-jerk reaction, and also find it difficult to sketch out an anti-racist position without addressing vaccine equity, or the adjacency of anti-vaccine rhetoric to narratives of reverse colonialism entailing the subjugation of white people; not to mention their rabid antisemitism. I would not foreclose a left-wing critique of government policy but would agree with Florian that its dangerous to couch far-right sentiment in left wing discourse. On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:06 PM Hoofd, I.M. (Ingrid) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Your knee-jerk response is an excellent example of elitist and false-oppositional ‘left’ thinking that has completely fallen for the government and big-pharma propaganda, and forgets to think critically about power structures, knowing very well that right-wing and left-wing, while also entertaining huge differences, are not pure opposites. Baudet would be proud of you; he can rake in the spoils.____ ____ Cheers, Ingrid.____ __ __ __ __ *From:*Florian Cramer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Thursday, 20 January 2022 13:00 *To:* Hoofd, I.M. (Ingrid) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: <nettime> CfP: Critical reflections on pandemic politics: left-wing, feminist and anti-racist critiques____ __ __ - Government propaganda and censorship around lockdown and vaccination____ [...] ____ - The role of mass and social media in anti- or pro-lockdown or vaccine propaganda, political polarization and forms of media virality (eg. via covid-19 memes)____ [...] ____ - Mandatory vaccine rollouts as assaults to the feminist appeal to bodily autonomy____ [...] ____ - Ethical considerations regarding mass experimentation, moral shaming and lateral citizen surveillance____ [...]____ - Teleological and theological narratives of science as salvation (eg. via vaccinations)____ __ __ All beautiful examples of a "Querfront" discourse where extreme right positions are packaged in left-wing rhetoric. Not a single point, however, on minorities and vulnerable people and communities endangered by anti-vaccer egoism, and neo-Darwinist politics - for example in the UK, Sweden and the Netherlands, of "herd immunity" through survival of the fittest.____ __ __ You should invite Dutch experts Willem Engel and Thierry Baudet as keynote speakers.____ __ __ -F____ ____ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l <http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l> # archive: http://www.nettime.org <http://www.nettime.org> contact: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l <http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l> # archive: http://www.nettime.org <http://www.nettime.org> contact: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: