Geoffrey Goodell via nettime-l on Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:33:51 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Founder Mode |
This recent article by Paul Graham is interesting: https://paulgraham.com/foundermode.html I felt that I was reading the notes from someone who had just seen a talk by Ayn Rand. It suggests a special relationship between founders and the companies they create, which cannot be replicated 'professional managers', who are mere custodians. Speaking personally, I strongly reject the implied normative conclusion, which would seem to be that we should all either 'get our own' or submit to the leadership of some dictatorial 'alpha' person. Civilisation is about rising above this herd instinct. It reminded me of this extended essay by Venkatesh Rao, wherein he analyses the popular television show, 'The Office', suggesting that the world can be divided into sociopaths, losers, and clueless: https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-or-the-office-according-to-the-office/ Maybe the model can be useful in characterising how organisations evolve, but let's remember that it is still a model. Maybe managers should be more critical of what their direct reports are telling them, or indeed avoid becoming too lazy about allowing their operations to drift without purpose. But to suggest that it is a duty of managers to scour their companies for 'important' people and bring them on a retreat misses a critical point: Those people, important as they may be, will never be founders themselves. So, what is really in it for them? Best wishes -- Geoff -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: [email protected]