Krystian Woznicki on Sat, 21 Mar 1998 14:12:15 +0100 (MET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Interview with Sawaragi Noi on cyberpunk |
SCI-FI RUINS, LA MODE RETRO, CLAUSTROPHOBIA. Sawaragi Noi about Fukui Shojin and Cyberpunk Interviewed by Krystian Woznicki, March 1996 *1] Fukui Shojin's Rubber's Lover (1995) is preoccupied with interdependent layers of isolation. The film focuses on the activities of a scientist group, which dedicates its research to explore man's psychic horizons. The laboratory is set in the basement of some remote factory. As they basically do not leave the lab, their situation gains increasingly claustrophobic features. Of interest here are the methods they employ in order to overcome the'nothingness' beyond technology, - Fukui is critically aware that new media brings about "the problem to find genuine means of self-expression [while] further increasing people's isolation." *2] The technological device DDD (Digital Direct Drive) is used in order to eradicate people's consciousness. Penetrated by a colossal motorized needle that is loaded with a chemical, they are expected to go on a psychic odyssey. In this way they expand their mental horizon, and establish potential capacity for psychic relationships. The desired effects are only achieved, when a rubber suit is used in addition. This compact floatation tank ensures entire isolation, and eventually enables the transcendence of ones physical limits. As a result one is capable of entering the Other, "being internalized as another self". Those who reach this state of being are depicted as condemned to the most radical kind of isolation: literally shown as drug addicts. Krystian Woznicki: The discussion of Fukui Shojin's Rubber's Lover I would like to begin with a consideration of the shift in cinematic space. Compared to Pinocchio (1990) it is reduced to claustrophobic indoor footage and a few anonymous/alienating outdoor shots. Everything conspires in The Center where the scientist team ---dissociated from the outside world--- concentrates, manipulates and produces 'energy'. Sawaragi Noi: The claustrophobic notion in Rubber's Lover is not limited to the interior space of the research institute which functions as the stage of the movie. It also applies to the appearing characters living in the research institute. (For example the men whose whole bodies were to be covered with rubber). It is needless to say, that also the outside of the research institute, which is often created by such images as the inside a of a moving car, is also a sort of claustrophobic space. Therefore, I would not say, that the claustrophobic space in Rubber's Lover is established by the relation of the inside and outside. I would rather suggest, that both sides are characterized by the same level of claustrophobic space. The uneven distribution between inside and outside leads to an image, where the outside melts into the inside and where the claustrophobic space has lost an outside. In other words it is about the fact that only an inside exists. The power to maintain such a blockaded space is in Fukui's earlier piece Pinocchio created by showing the hopeless effort of Pinocchio to escape by running at full speed through the city. The "rule of the scientist" roughly fits this image. I am deeply interested in this "rule of the scientist", which seems to be the one common motif in both movies. But what is it exactly that these scientists think they are ruling (controlling)? I am not sure about this, but the least that can be said is, that "the scientists" fear those moments, when the order of the claustrophobic space starts to waver dynamically. Though there is a secret leakage in Pinocchio and though the experiments on human bodies are a failure in Rubber's Lover, the order inside is artificially maintained by the "internal organs." They want to suppress any leakage to the outside. When there is danger of actual leakage to the outside, their reactions are close to hysteria, they cry and it is the end of any scientific behavior. With their getting excited, this place can only collapse. Fukui describes this "leakage" often by showing the gush of bodily fluids. In Rubber's Lover it is indicated by the various body fluids gushing out of the body's openings such as the mouth, the ears and the nose. The essential here is, that from the point of view of the cinematic set up, the image is produced by the suppression of the body through the torture and the experiments on the human body. However, regardless of this, in reality it is the unfolding of the rules against the body by "them", that creates the image of torture and the failure of the experiments on the human body. In addition to the above mentioned I would like to emphasize again that the claustrophobic space in Rubber's Lover is not produced by the opposition of the inside to the outside, but by the loss of an outside. The maintenance of such a space is impossible no matter what kind of power the scientists have. For me, the consistent motif in the movie is the natural collapse of such a space. Therefore, one aspect of the movie is to deal with the entropy of the inside space, that leads inevitably to its collapse. (This entropy does not apply to the outside). At one glance, Fukui creates a rather narcissistic image of the claustrophobic space. It is not his desire to maintain a kind of Order/Suppression fetish, but on the contrary to make the inside break down. Krystian Woznicki: A particular dimension of Rubber's Lover's (claustrophobic) cinematic space is subtly intertwined with another formal novelty that crucially discerns Fukui's second feature from his first: the question in which historical context the film is set (a matter that seems effaced in Fukui's minimal/reductive composition) and "la mode retro," which is, in the first place, composed of Fukui's decision to shoot in B &W and with "classic" lighting. The principle Fukui has imposed upon himself, to shoot only indoor/inside (that may include outdoor as well like the car scene you mention shows) is even enhanced through reduced employment of (any decorative) set elements: the machinery and the people (the scientists) are from the very outset predominantly in focus. As we look at the machines they use, we cannot but notice (hopelessly) outdated standards. The scientist's futuristic laboratory aim is pursued with a scientific approach that is far behind our time. A spontaneous search for indications that might contain historical information reveals that Rubber's Lover is devoid of those artefacts with reference to a particular historical context. Although -at first glance-the film seems to be set in our time, or the near future, Fukui's "styling" and editing blurs any contemporary reference (the clothes may be the only exception) on one hand, and informs artefacts such as experimental equipment, DDD's basic components, telephones, etc. with an indecipherable (not future but) pastness code, -they seem of some other age (maybe the 40's, 50's ?), but we cannot clearly designate a year, or decade of which we may find prove/hints in the film itself (:no media, including TV, radio, newspapers, no particular fashion, no particular language; nothing really allows us to classify/situate the film historically.) Questions about Fukui's involvement in Japan's >>Cyberpunk<< movement, of which he certainly is one of the initiators, come to mind. Associations with Tsukamoto Shinya's The Iron Man (1989) are inevitable; grounded on superficial similarities. But why, we ask ourselves, would somebody undertake to make a film so decisively inspired by a movie made about six years earlier, characteristic for a "subgenre" that is about to decline, as it seems to have lost its point of reference? Is it difficult, or even say, impossible to designate the film's setting on historical terms, there is, at the same time, seemingly no argument to be found which would incite us to plead its relevance/necessity in its receptive historical context. Couldn't it have been made some time in the 80's (which the soundtrack suggests)? If we realize that Rubber's Lover is itself a product of and about a non-definable/non-traceable past, then I wonder how it relates to what is called >>Cyberpunk<<; a movement that emerged as a reaction on the cultural dilemma of Japan's 80's generation that was overshadowed by undigested post WW2 aftereffects. This "subgenre" reinvented the feel characteristic of popular TV series such as Ultraman 7 (a product of the occupation years, which, created in the postwar period, had an enormous influence on the psychological development of young Japanese boys and girls, as you mentioned earlier as well) and reevoked those segments of Japan's immediate post WW2 (psychological) atmosphere informed by moments such as trauma/impoverishment/defeat which were 'lived' at that time; the message being, "the vacuum that was then, is now. The key to present problems lies in the past." Sawaragi Noi: First I would like to make some supplementary comments on the reception of Japanese Cyber Punk, which concern Ridley Scott's Bladerunner and the later produced New Romance by William Gibson. After an overabundance of Japanese images, created by earlier filmmakers, the works of these two men led to one decisive image of Japan, which is the setting of a movie-stage resembling "Chiba City." This image was later applied by many other filmmakers. The "Cyber Kids" in Japan mostly quote those two men and their works as the "classics" of Cyber Punk. However, did Scott and Gibson really intent to deal with Japan or wasn`t it rather a coincidence, a creation by chance that their works were associated with Japan? In general "Cyber Punk" as a part and with reference to the history of SF, is described by three distinct features, which are "Cyber Space," the "Near Future" and the "Ruins." In the thriving 50ies, filmmakers took the Genre SF to extremes and took pride in the "Outer Universe." Although the 60ies were characterized by the "New Wave," which focused on the quest for the "Inner Universe", there was no real novelty in the conception of Science Fiction. This was left to the emerging strange "Deja Vu," which wrapped up everything. ("Cyber Space," "Near Future," "Ruins" and the strange "Deja Vu " -- They are all, with some slight variations under way, common to Fukui's Rubber's Lover.) In the beginning of the 20th century SF was enhanced by the discoveries of Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics. In Fine Arts, the Futuristic School and Cubism and of course futuristic movies such as Fritz Lang's Metropolis dealt with the changes, which extended to the whole of society and which were taken as signs for a shift in paradigm. The new paradigm was characterized by the application of the same machinery all over the world, thus leading to its uniformization. This became the starting point for the later development of SF and at the same time took in advance its limit. Until the 1970s this "limit" consisted of the constant gap between the "development" of SF and its "unfolding." After the 1980ies, SF as a whole started to rethink itself and to go back to its origins. The time for self reference had begun and with this also "Cyber Punk." In other words, after the 1980ies, "Cyber Punk" called on the crisis of SF as a genre. Moreover, the development of scientific techniques had gradually caught up with SF imagination and the present seemed to be superior to the projections. Even the framework of the motivational setting of past SF, the binomial opposition of "Outer Universe/Inner Universe" was put into question. All this resulted in the effort of many and ambiguous works to originate something new. Our believe is, that the whole scientifically oriented society is related to superficiality, although we are only unconsciously aware of this. In reference to our background, it was until then, impossible to think of us as individualistic subjects. In the present days, technical media theory has clarified this aspect by stating, that there is no more to do, but to break down the common-sense binomial oppositions like "past/future" and "cultural science/natural science." This also means that the disturbance of this binomial opposition easily extends until "Reality/Fiction." Another polarization used to be by former literates the denomination of "serious literature" and by later ones "Science Fiction." However, it is no mystery that after the 1980ies the circumstances had become less clear and there was no exact borderline between "Serious Literature and Science Fiction" anymore. At the same time Science Fiction had to notice the fact, that it could not exist without any of the two elements which are on the one hand "Science" and on the other hand "Fiction." In other words, "Cyber Punk" willingly established "Ruins." After the existing binomial oppositions, such as "past/future," "High Tech/Junk," "Outer Universe/Inner Universe" and "High Class Culture/Subculture" were broken down, they were reestablished as a new genre-like foundation of SF. Therefore SF was a ruin by itself. From the viewpoint of SF, the disturbance of such a tense, space and class structure all led to one, the awareness, that SF must be able to withdraw from the past, the future and the present and relevant places. The result was the "Near Future," which was therefore originally a kind of "Cyber Space." Suddenly the three holy treasures of Cyberpunk, that is the "Near Future," "Ruins" and "Cyberspace (electronic brain space)" agreed with it. (Surely, in accordance with what you pointed out already, it is difficult to fix the specific time setting of Rubber's Lover. The establishment of a distinct multi-sound space is another aspect of the movie. Although my mother tongue is Japanese, I find it hard to catch the meaning of the words in several sequences of the dramatic conversation. The mixing of various sounds and the persons' uttering sounds paradoxically gives the impression of both: To be without nationality and to have many different nationalities. Usually Japanese filmmakers use Black&White on the purpose of imaginary sweet nostalgia. You will easily find lots of examples for such kind of employment, but in "Rubber's Lover" B&W is used to reflect the present. It enfosters a kind of separation as it turns around the B&W image.) This signifies an overdue attempt of "Meta Fiction," which was transplanted into the soil of SF. Also there was obviously an effort to cultivate it. Furthermore, the overexcessive images are part of the strategy to build on the ruins of SF, which is a distinct SF design. It means to first collect every possible design created by earlier SF and in a second step to create a Meta-SF out of if -- this formed the unconsciousness of "Cyber Punk." In short, you could actually see the establishment of the "Ruins" in "Cyber Punk," although it is not in relation to the fixation of a stage-setting, but due to the appearing creatures. They are like leftover lumber, without one distinct reason for existence they become the objects of practical use in various forms. Junk Culture originates in this feature, because he/she is recycled by an activation of the downbroken past history. However, the nostalgia of man-made "Science" and "Fiction," assembled from the fragments of a now ending history, creates the Zombie. It is like alchemy, it is the truth of the other side. After the 1980s such techniques turned into one major cultural aspect. In Fine Arts Simulationism used waste articles of a past history and in Music the similar attempt of "House Music" signify the trend towards mixing everything. The metaphor for the atmosphere in Japan at that time could be roughly called "historical-surgery," which is shown also in Rubber's Lover, where the human body is cut into pieces applying rather freely criminal scientific techniques. An act which is often accompanied by the thought to thinking to create a kind of monster. Surely, after the introduction of Cyber Punk, without wanting to question serious literature and SF in Japan, "Near Future Junk and Cyber Taste" called works became very popular. But among all those works it is not easy to clarify those, who are actually works of Cyber Punk and they cannot be selected only by the historical perspective as mentioned above. What it probably lacks, is one aspect of the "Near Future," which is called Meta literature and which is used to color the "Cyber Space." There are a number of devices (Ruins, Asia, foolish regiment, without nationality...) in Japan, to refer to the ruins of the cities as found just after WW II and they are usually associated rather with memories of the "Near Past" and not the "Near Future." From this point of view, the strategy to build up a nostalgia had naturally to be different. (Taking off from this point, I think this is why you cannot see the "Near Future" in Cyber Punk and why it had to be set up in Chiba (New Romance ) and Dotonbori (Black Rain ).) I think that Rubber's Lover offers some good result on this judgment. The "Cyber Punk made in Japan" criticized outside of Japan, for example tomo Katsuhiro's Akira -- considers the reversal of tense, by overemphasizing the three elements, "Cyber Space," "Near Future" and "Ruins," which leads to a somehow dislikable image. In Rubber's Lover these SF elements are almost ignored, on the contrary, the awkward feelings, the shortage of material, the spiritual pressure, the negative elements are the fundamental axis, around which the movie is advancing. This has something to do with what you already mentioned concerning the sufferings of Japan just after WW II. I would only like to add one thing to the ways in which the time of occupation is described. I think it has something to do with how the people had to live during those times and I would like to call it the matters of the "Black Market." The "Black Market" witnessed a sudden increase shortly after the war, which could be traced by the way illegal business was done and by increasing marketplaces (called barracks) built by the merchants. The "Black Market" did not mean big business; it rather stands for all those little criminal acts and small crimes, that were committed by poor people in order to cope with survival and to go on living. It was a place ruled by poor peoples wisdom. Even if in Fukui's Rubber's Lover the core of description is one of "illegality," it refers to this "Black Market," sets free this kind of charm and above that, refers to the power of people to deal with a peculiar chaos in their lives. (In reality, this picture was shot at an extreme low budget, Fukui himself did not call it "Low Budget," but "No Budget," but the useless lumber extending to the whole city area is collected every evening, and of high practical use.) Those elements, which are introduced to the outside of Japan as "Cyber Punk," can thus only be interpreted in the context of shortage. * Translation by Barbara Fuchs Notes 1] This interview was earlier published in full length in BLIMP Filmmagazine No.35/1996 2] From a Fukui Shojin Interview by Krystian Woznicki in Tokyo, January 9.1995 ---------- SAWARAGI NOI teaches art and communication at Musashino Art University and in Osaka. He has recently published the books >>Techno-Delick<< and >>Atom-Mother-Heart<<. His current book is a pioneering project on art after WW2 >>Japan-Contemporary-Art<< published by Shinchosha. --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: [email protected]