zeljko blace on Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:26:59 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[nettime-see] Re: [spectre] IHT on Lessig at WOS3, Berlin, June 10-12, 2004 |
Inke Arns wrote: >New copyright grants artists greater license >By Jennifer L. Schenker (IHT) >Monday, June 14, 2004 > > >An alternative copyright that allows authors and artists to give away >their work while retaining some commercial rights is being adapted >for use across Europe and beyond. > >Lawyers, musicians and filmmakers gathered in Berlin on Friday for >the German introduction of the licenses, which were first drafted for >use in the United States in 2001 by Creative Commons, a Silicon >Valley nonprofit organization. The German debut followed the >introduction of Creative Commons licenses in Japan in March, in >Finland in May and in Brazil on June 4. > >Some 60 countries are expected to adapt Creative Commons licenses to >their jurisdiction, "and Germany is a critical part of that process," >said Lawrence Lessig, the Stanford University law professor who is >the chairman and co-founder of Creative Commons. > >Creative Commons licenses will be introduced in the Netherlands next >Friday and in France by the end of the summer, with a goal of >creating licenses for all EU countries by year-end, Lessig said in an >interview by phone last week. > >The idea behind Creative Commons licenses is to give musicians the >freedom to release their work to people who want to disseminate it or >to remix the music and try something new, Lessig said. Artists choose >how they want to share the work, specifying whether they want credit >for reuse, whether they want to be paid for commercial use or whether >it is acceptable to change it. > >"This is a different way of spreading or building upon musical >works," Lessig said. > >Lessig, who says that copyright and patent law is too restrictive, is >the author of "Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the >Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity," which he has made >available on the Internet for free. The bound version from Penguin >Press costs $24.95. He has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court >against extending the length of time that copyrights cover original >works, a period that lasts 95 years in the United States, and is an >advocate of open-source software, which is distributed freely on the >Internet. > >Businesses that own the rights or sell software, however, argue that >copyrights and patents reward creative and inventive people for their >talents and compensate companies that hire and promote them. The ease >with which digitized music and other digital files are shared on the >Internet has given the intellectual arguments new importance. > >Bj�rn Hartmann, a German disc jockey and creator of the online music >label textone.org, which releases free music, said that while he >believed Europe's independent musicians and those with small or >online labels would benefit from Creative Commons licenses, most >established performing artists and composers in Germany would not, at >least for now. > >The German introduction of Creative Commons licenses, which Lessig >acknowledged was the "most difficult to date," is complicated by >rules in Germany that require musicians to give up rights to their >work when they sign up with agencies that collect royalties on their >behalf. > >The license has been adapted to take German copyright law into >account, requiring changes in things such as the definitions of terms >and the extent to which a work can be modified, said Till J�ger, a >German lawyer who helped adapt the license for Germany. > >But many performing artists in Germany sign up with a specialized >local royalty collection agency called the German Phono Association, >and give up some of their rights when they do so. And most composers >or songwriters sign up with another royalty collection agency, called >the German Society for Musical Performing and Mechanical Reproduction >Rights, and allow it to negotiate on their behalf, J�ger said. > >While performers and composers who have signed up with collection >agencies cannot opt for a Creative Commons license because they no >longer hold the rights to their own works, Christiane Asschenfeldt, >the international coordinator for Creative Commons, said discussions >have begun with the Society for Musical Performing and Reproduction >Rights to work out a solution. > >Society officials were not available for comment on Friday. > >When composers sign up with the society, they sign over the rights >not only to a particular work but to all works in their repertoire, >past, present and future, said Thomas Dreier, a professor at the >University of Karlsruhe's Information Law Institute in Germany, who >helped draft the German implementation of the Creative Commons >license. > >Meanwhile, independent musicians in Germany as well as others - >including writers, filmmakers, scientists and photographers - can >elect to use the Creative Commons license. > >Eight of the institutes that are part of the Max Planck Society for >the Advancement of the Sciences, Germany's leading organization for >basic scientific research, will be among the first to use the >Creative Commons license, Asschenfeldt said. Scientists will use the >Creative Commons license as a way of publicly disseminating research >while reserving some but not all rights. > >European Cultural Heritage Online, an initiative sponsored by the >European Commission that involves three of the Max Planck institutes >and 13 other European partners, has also said it wants a Creative >Commons license, she said. > >International Herald Tribune > > > >Inke Arns >http://www.v2.nl/~arns > > >______________________________________________ >SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe >Info, archive and help: >http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre > > > > ............................................... Nettime-SEE mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-see