integer on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:11:09 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: selection of time-based works |
>from >http://www.videonale.org/selectjury.htm > >>the videonale 9 selection jury, consisting of georg elben, s<F6>ren grammel, ma >ria >Lind, silke otto-knapp and nicolaus schafhausen chose 31 productions by >altogether 36 artists (some working in teams) from over 1500 entries > >>the selection jury took six full days for the viewing and discussion of the >tapes. an additional week<B9>s time was taken for making the final decisions. > >my question is: how jury consists of 5 members can look 1500 + videos in 6 >days? >[and 14 urls, if belived fwd-re nn mail @ syndicate; urls are not mentioned >at videonale public reports] >jury suppose to work together, is't it? > >my point is that video and net art are time-based works ... fast-forwarding >or fragmented look of the video works or urls misses that point ... > >first round: >6 days = 144 hours = 8640 minutes !!! with no sleep !!! >8640 minutes : 1500 entries = less than 6 minutes > >theoretically !!! with no sleep !!! ... what about practically? > >in contrary, second round 'additional week<B9>s time was taken for making the >final decisions' sounds ok for me ... > >so, i put under question first round of selection. >can we belive that jury took a look at works and not at names? > >d well - as indicated previously they certainly have not accessed my entry. amicalement.nn - Netochka Nezvanova - the spreading web like rhythm we towards inch with f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST - each impression yes +? @www.eusocial.com 17.hzV.tRL.478 e | | +---------- | | < \\----------------+ | n2t | > e ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <[email protected]> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe [email protected]