Syndicate admin on Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:20:57 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: Mark Eaton: Re: nn |
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:33:12 +0200 Subject: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [mark eaton <[email protected]>] Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:37:14 +0000 (UTC) From: mark eaton <[email protected]> X-X-Sender: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: nn i feel it would be vastly unfortunate to loose nn on this list. do those who run this list desire to sculpt its flow? They may restrain themselves, but my guess is yes; many of us may want to. I have the vague desire that it be 'better'. <grin>. Nn wants to sculpt too. have you noticed? but theres a differece: sculpting a amalgam like a list/society/discourse is a different thing than wanting to sculpt individuals (as nn does). so, what is implied in the difference of approach? or if you like, your favourite means to better quality discourse? what shall we sculpt today? -Mark Eaton -----Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to post to the Syndicate list: <[email protected]> to unsubscribe, write to <[email protected]>, in the body of the msg: unsubscribe syndicate [email protected]