Andreas Broeckmann on Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:19:20 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
O. Marchart on Refresh |
from: Final Debate of Metaforum III: 'Under Construction' The Budapest Content Conference, October 13, 1996 Oliver Marchart: I would like to reconnect the most impressive presentations of today, not the speeches but the ones about net.art, with the economic theories. I did not even know that I had an economic theory until this afternoon. Suddenly, it came to me as a surprise and a revelation that capitalism is exactly the same as art criticism. I agree with Manuel that there is not such a thing as Capitalism. There are Capitalisms. Even on the Internet you can find many Capitalisms. There is this Post-Fordist flow of financial capital and early Capitalism existing at the same time. At the end of the day, the common denominator of all these forms of Capitalism comes down to one single question: How to turn crap into gold. We know from what Rachel said this morning, that 99% of net.art is crap. But this does not count for art on the Internet only. In museums and galleries it is the same. As soon as art enters the museum it has been turned into gold by the work of art critics and curators. What is now going on, concerning net.art, is a kind of transformation into gold, not done by art critics but by Capitalists. We do not need art critics to see that Olia Lialina's Cinemafantom or the Refresh project works. Vuk's question, 'What will happen with projects that indeed work?', is highly important. What would happen if you would sell such a work to a web journal for an amount of money far less than a normal article would get? What kind of Capitalism is this? It is a commodification of labour in the form of exploitation, to use an old-fashioned word. A strategy would be to find some form of organisation among artists about how to proceed in these cases. Or to produce something like Refresh. This art form is difficult to be buy and sell because it is located on different servers. It is charming and has an appeal because everybody wants to be part of it. This is not about content but about a form of communication, about linking. It relies solely on connections. [...] Transcribed and edited by Geert Lovink and Thomas Bass -- * distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission * <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, * collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets * more info: [email protected] and "info nettime" in the msg body * URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: [email protected]