ichael . benson on Tue, 11 May 1999 12:00:48 +0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: Polarization |
(1) "Made in China". Strolling beside the Adriatic, we come to a kiosk selling, not sunglasses, bathing suits, beach-balls, etc., but hundreds of different kinds of graphics-heavy, well-packaged, cheap plastic toys. These include: what looks like an entire division of the US Army, complete with rocket launchers, little green soldiers, tanks, jet fighters, American flags, etc. And in another box: a substantial, miniaturized percentage of the British Army, with troop carriers, artillery, planes, tanks etc. All the garish promo text on these boxes is in English, and at the bottom of each package, it says, in small letters: "Made in China." No, ironies never cease. When it comes to the Balkans, as the saying goes, they've always produced more history than they can consume locally. Why not export some? For example, to China? (2) Boy, when they fuck up, they don't mess around -- they really, truly, definitively fuck up, and in world-historical terms. Imagine, for a minute, the spooks of Langley, Virginia. It's late at night, the TV is on, CNN tuned low, there are pizza boxes and cups of cold coffee strewn all around, they're examining their seven-year old tourist maps of Belgrade, feeling very important and world historical, marking doomed buildings with a highlighter pen. But why are these maps so old, you might ask? Because, like most cities, Belgrade doesn't feel a need to print an all-new, updated city map every year. Why should they? They don't get any tourists anyway. But, you say, this is the CIA -- with a budget of ten gadzillion dollars a minute! Well, forget satellite photos: it doesn't even occur to these people to pick up the phone, call Belgrade information -- hello, do you speak English? -- and simply confirm a street address. "Could you tell us what's at this address, please? What did you say? The... CHINESE EMBASSY?" Just as it didn't occur to NATO to call the TV Serbia switchboard, and say: "you have 20 minutes to get yourself and everyone else out of there, because we just launched one. No joke." (3) Had an insight into he nature of polarization and war recently. Went something like this: Chinese students, raging, roiled, one of them with that "target" inked onto the top of his bald head -- yes, the ubiquitous Serbian self-martyrdom PR-victory of a symbol (I say it admiringly! Admiringly!); yes, on his head, facing up -- well-placed not for the squinty-eyes of satellite-guided cruise missiles (the ostensible audience), but for the squinty eyes of a crack team of international photojournalists (the intended audience). So what's it doing, then, in Beijing? This *Serbian* target? What's it doing there, if not serving as symbolic proof that the projection of Balkan polarization has reached its farthest possible throw? Pure, hieroglyphic, epigrammatic, diagrammatic, polarization: the US Embassy, the raging pissed-off Chinese students, the cops in-between with instructions to let 'em do what they want. A haiku, a veritable parable, a miniature of Balkan polarization, export style. I mean, who gave a damn about Serbia in China before? This is the disease that Milosevic has brought to the world since he stabbed his mentor Stambolic in the back in '87 (while grabbing power with the other hand). These splits and divisions and fissures and cracks, now reaching way far out on the map, all the way across ancient trade routes, silk roads, yellow rivers, rice patties, encompassing the whole globe. They're his great achievement. But, you ask, wasn't it Yankee Imperialist airpower that torched the Chinese Embassy, after oxymoronic military intelligence (read: the CIA. Disassemble immediately, do not reassemble; leave in small scattered pieces in Arlington, Virginia; prime pig-farming land), etc? How to blame it, then on, Slobodan? Do you blame everything on Slobodan Milosevic? (4) Well, yes, actually. Or, at least, in particular, this specific, tragic, millennial, global, Balkan polarization. Not the same phenomenon as 'Balkanization', but close. Here we have everybody taking sides everywhere. Very dangerous. The Chinese students who once built a statue of liberty in Tiannenmen Square are now burning the American flag. The Macedonian slavs are streaming out of the predominantly Albanian parts of Macedonia; they're selling houses, land. They know what's about to happen, and they're preemptively self-polarizing. The western liberal left is divided, polarized, at odds over the use -- any use -- of western military power. Some recognize fascism when they see it; others think that dusting off that particular word is "rhetoric". It "isn't useful". (Advocating the *military defeat* of fascism, meanwhile, is seen as some kind of dopey naive collusion with the only evil they've ever trained themselves to recognize.) The right is also divided, between those who think we "don't have a dog in this fight" (and the band strikes up the tune! And the lyrics continue: "so why not give the JNA a green light..." i.e., descendents of James Baker, in chorus) -- and those who council massive land invasions, a total leveling of Belgrade, etc. The German left-center coalition government is increasingly polarized, balancing under their new glass Reichstag dome between 'no war... well, not for much more' Greens, and 'stay the course, use the Luftwaffe' others. The Italians? They're freaked out, simultaneously sympathetic about the refugees and paranoid about them taking to boats and heading for Italy, and what's more very unclear about if they can stand being NATO's main aircraft carrier anymore. Blair? He's revved himself up into Churchillian overdrive, but all by itself the British Army isn't remotely up to the rhetoric. Clinton? He's completely polarized, but this goes without saying. He wants the steak, and the fish. He wants the reefer, but not the inhalation. He wants the blow-job, but not "sexual relations with that woman". He wants a war without any casualties; he wants to be *seen* to "take a stand against ethnic cleansing", while not-so-covertly sending signals that he'll negotiate. This is the same guy, remember, who made a "never forget" speech alongside Elie Weisel at the inauguration of the Holocaust Museum in Washington -- at the exact same time as Serbian shells were raining down on Sarajevo during the *third year* of siege. (5) Meanwhile the Serbs in Kosovo are rampaging, blowing heads off, torching villages, raping, murdering, driving 1.5 million people into graves, madness, other countries; chasing them into the hills to starve; slitting throats, torching mosques, land records, documents, archives. Words can't describe it; certainly the word 'polarization' would have to work overtime to describe it. (6) The mailing lists are also polarized, at war, hornet's nests. People remembering better times write despairing e-mails, then give up. Tired of the mono-subject with its battle-lines, they want to get back to ruminating peacefully over the implications of cyber-this and virtual that. I even confronted my own alter-ego on-line recently, a kind of pure stupid confirmation of polarization. It made me think about some things, like: is this an *equal-opposite* polarization? Does the pro-Milosevic bias of the other 'me' imply that I'm somehow now whatever fire-breathing pro-NATO-war caricature could be constructed, I mean out of a semi-understanding of my true position? In *that* version of me -- the version held by the other 'me' -- am I supposed to be enjoying, or getting some kind of satisfaction from, the horrific spectacle of the success of all of Milosevic's efforts? Under which heading I include all of the destruction being rained down on Serbia by NATO? (5) One little story. We go to Rab, two weeks ago; an Adriatic island not far from the Herzegovinian hinterlands. This is a place that should be prosperous, fat with tourist money. But it isn't, because Croatia hasn't had more than one and a half good tourist seasons in ten years. At a distant corner of the island, we look for a room to rent, and wind up in a faintly seedy-looking town. Since we're right in front of the large busy central cafe-bar, we decide to ask, despite the seediness, if there might be some rooms to rent nearby -- maybe in nicer terrain, farther away. A squinty, dangerous-looking dude, late 30's, deep tan, long hair, the owner of the joint, says he'll call some friends and ask. He invites us inside. He's wearing a big gold medallion with someone's silhouetted face on it -- gold chain, engraved letters, etc. I don't quite get who that face is, but when we go inside we see, up on the wall -- exactly where the smiley Josip Broz Tito portrait must've been, once - a blurry B&W framed picture of a scary-looking guy in a retro-military uniform. Hawk eyes, long nose. I ask one of the waiters who it is -- even though I'm already beginning to suspect. "Ante Pavelic", he says. As if it's the most normal thing in the world. Only the leader of the Nazi puppet state of Croatia in the 40's. Pal of Himmler, creator of death-camps, mass murderer of hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, etc. So -- a quick, profound case of the Deep Europe creeps. The gold medallion, of course, is also of Pavelic. And suddenly, the crowd of shifty-eyed, beer-drinking, chain-smoking louts hanging around the bar slams into clear focus: all the owner's Ustache war buddies. And we get out of there, of course, as quickly as we can without running. But just before we go, there's a loud roar of jets over the Adriatic, heading for Serbia. And I suddenly realize (and you'll just have to either 1. trust me on this one or 2. disagree with me; your choice) that the Pavelic on the wall and the itchy-trigger-finger beer-drinkers and the Hell's-Angel-from-hell bar-owner wouldn't be there -- or at least, not in anything like the way they are -- if it wasn't for Milosevic. The guy who set the ethnic-difference demons free, starting in 1987. The great polarizer. The guy who laid the groundwork for Croatian fascism, Franjo Tudjman, HDZ, etc. The one who armed and supported the first wave of ethnic cleansing by the Kraijna Serbs in 1991, producing the first round of radicalized refugees thirsty for revenge. And I look up at the invisible jets, and I think to myself: they wouldn't be going, obviously, where they're going, if not for this same reason -- this same man. This war-lord in his self-created Balkan Mordor. And I realize that *I* also wouldn't be standing there, hearing and seeing all this, if it wasn't for Milosevic. How so? Because we're on the island of Rab due to the Slovenian independence day vacation weekend. And this also, very probably, wouldn't have happened without Milosevic. (And if it had, it would have taken place in another way: quietly, like Slovakia separating from the Czech republic, for example.) So, it makes a perfect triangulation, produced, directed and edited by Milosevic: Ustache killers in an uneasy retirement, military jets in the sky, the placement of an observer who is there in the first place because of a national independence day that might never have happened. The whole picture is a lesson about the nature of power. It's the victory of that man's power, pure and simple. Because power is really all about engineering the reality around you to suit your tastes, isn't it? Applying your own warped reality, literally, to reality -- so that *actual reality warps*, and follow the contours you've made for it. From Bill Gates (no bodies, at least that I know of) to Slobodan Milosevic (250,000 and counting). (6) I remember Yugoslavia. It was a great country. The people had real spirit. They were proud, they knew how to have a good time, they were very hospitable, they smoked too much and were charismatic. They played the best rock and roll in the socialist world. I miss it. Polarized to death. Michael Benson <[email protected]> <http://www.ljudmila.org/kinetikon/> ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate/ to unsubscribe, write to <[email protected]> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe [email protected]