William Waites on Wed, 21 May 2014 19:50:26 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Surveillance in Scotland -- More of the Same |
Surveillance in Scotland -- More of the Same -------------------------------------------- Edinburgh, May 2014 There is a petition [1] in front of the Scottish Parliament to conditionally grant Edward Snowden asylum should Scotland become independent. This presented an interesting opportunity yesterday for the parliament -- or individual politicians -- to take a position on what is probably the most significant issue of this generation: the transformation of society through ubiquitous surveillance. This topic has been conspicuous by its absence from the independence debate so far and the parliament missed its chance. Several of the MSPs on the committee were sympathetic to the idea, but the discussion soon degenerated into the technicalities of extradition and missed the point. They chose to focus on the Scottish Government Whitepaper says that it intends to maintain current extradition arrangements [2] and so the actual taking up of an asylum offer might be unlikely, and in any case would have to wait until 2016. The point that the gesture itself would be significant was largely ignored. What could be the reason for this? The whitepaper also says that the organisation of the security and intelligence services will be primarily done with guidance from the UK. Given the level of overreach and probable illegality [3] that has been engaged in by the UK, this is a poor model for an independent Scotland to copy. If one were feeling cynical and disillusioned with politicians, it almost seems as though the apparently sympathetic words by some of the committee members may have been designed to create the impression of responsiveness to a petitioner who brought a serious public grievance before them, along with something concrete that they could do about it whilst doing nothing about it. There was never any intention of doing anything about it because -- and I hope that I am wrong about this -- one thing that both the Scottish and the UK governments agree upon is that the citizens of Scotland will remain under constant surveillance no matter the outcome of the vote on September 18th. [1] http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/GettingInvolved/Petitions/asyluminscotlandforedwardsnowden [2] http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2013/11/9348/11 [3] http://kingsreview.co.uk/magazine/blog/2014/05/21/2014-the-return-of-big-brother/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]