scotartt on Sat, 6 Feb 1999 12:12:14 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: (babblefish) Kittlertranslation |
[friedrich kittler, according to babelfish--tb] Medium theory with Entlarvungsgestus: Friedrich Kittler The citizen of Berlin medium theoretician Friedrich Kittler is a professor for aesthetics and history of the media at the institute for art and culture sciences at the Humboldt University of Berlin. It will be in the coming year Fellow at the ' international research center culture sciences ' in Vienna. This organized together with the art-historical museum in October conference about " Audiovisualitaet before and after good mountain " - Kittlers <i>key note Speech</i> over " letter, numbers, codes " serves as cause to argue with Kittlers medium-theoretical beginning a little. </b></font> I'm handling the computer - the ' universal machine' - probably troubles the even Germans a strange omission: on the human factor to have built, instead of becoming fair a term of 'intelligence ' in more global, thus technical way. As one of the war-crucial factors the ability of the British Kryptologen team in Bletchley park probably proved to crack the codings of the German cipher machine ENIGMA. Which should make Alan Turing history as performance of a technical intelligence under guidance of the mathematician, the German armed forces attributed however to simply human failure. Their ENIGMA had a highest possible encoding technique, which was considered as so safe that the leaky place in the submarine war on level of the espionage was looked up and not on the level of machine codes themselves. Exactly this was however the decided point: to the machine logic could be answered evenly only with machine logic, how the Turing and its team proved. It is this missed insight that the problems of the Kryptologen could be solved only by Leibniz' counting and not by reflection over possible sense connections, which a driving motive for the theory formation of Friedrich Kittler forms. Is it medium theory? A medium science does not give it for Kittler, only a most superficial, in the form of " more kastrierter " film and television science, which bend " the Kniee " before tone or bit map memories, as he calls it. The reality of the media is many more abstract, than journalism-scientific contents and structural analyses let it suspect at all. With the druckerpresse Indian-Arab mathematics of the value broke in this combination of alphabetical combinations and technical algorithms, chute into European writing, with the typewriter the druckerpresse, in everyday writing found. With the computer the coding became universal finally - machine codes and software programs does not regard it anybody more whether they instruct to set easily characters or set however characters. This quotation carries features of all texts Kittlers, which are ironically in the lecture held like that for drying written as; the framework of scientific Serioesitaet is still so far maintained thereby even that nothing stands to a popularized rezeption in the way. At the same time well-known assertion samples are served, in this case trinitarische thinking, which progress from the father over the son to the holy spirit, as well as an always noticeable breath of conspiracy theory, which comes along military-historically verbraemt. To embody is it only consistent, progress thoughts in its last possible form, and unsurpassableness mathematical Recodierung codes as abstraction progress abendlaendischen culture so far to lining era that for finding thoughts ", from which once Leibniz had geschwaermt at least in the age of their last valid Materialisierung to justice it happens to those " computing apparatuses. To the better understanding it may be completed that Kittler by any means a Apotheose of the computers (which always may be - ' he called algorithmic Golems ' her once) does not supply, but bases of a criticism of the instrumental reason.</i> Yes, because anywhere a more radical immanent <i>criticism</i> of the computer era does not seem to initiate itself, than with Kittler themselves: a criticism of the acceptance, with the 'universal Turing machine ' would have arrived history (when " Pax Americana " goes so completely, because without war metaphors it never with Kittler) actually as theoretically at its end, so that of the possibility of other programmable machines only any longer one does not think. The machine operating with discrete decisions of the digital code behaves to the nature, which follows similar principles, purely approximately - for it, according to which it is <i>calculable</i> the theory is however white only too good that <i>everything</i> that is would not be <i>also</i> calculable. The digital Bitstream does not indicate thereby by any means the end of all things: gradual improvements in the predictability do not seal the end of history, similar data flow leave open still some options - also into possible further medium worlds -. Little utopia must already be, even in the era Microsoft, and Kittler is finally not naively technikglaeubig. <BLINK> *** TRANSLATION ENDS HERE *** </BLINK> --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [email protected] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: [email protected]