bazis on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:26:23 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nettime-ro] limbajul pe nettime-ro


Tu |f|...3
Nu ai un nume?
Bine ca ai opinie si publici pe nettime dar nu trebuie sa-ti fie  
rusine... si sa te ascunzi. Eu cred ca asta e o prostie.
BERSZAN Zsolt

Quoting | f | | | | 3 <[email protected]>:

>> el stiute) ,personaj cu care am avut si eu personal "o polemica" la
>> un moment
>> dat,DIN ACELEASI MOTIVE,dar am sfarsit "prieteni" in sensul
>> civilizat al
>> cuvantului,semn ca omul mai are inca o farama de bun simt pe care
>> contez si de
>> aceasta data.
>>
>> toate cele bune,
>>
>> NadiRa
>
>
> Depinde ce consideri polemica. De multe ori acest remarcabil 'bun
> simt' se scrie bun simt dar se pronunta Coruptie,
> ceea ce nu reprezinta o problema la nivel personal, dar la nivel
> disciplinar este o problema de care defapt va plingeti.
>
> Din punctul de vedere al politicienilor si al oamenilor 'obisnuiti'
> perjovschi are lipsa de bun simt.
>
> Perjovschi si 'alti' artisti se pling de coruptia politicienilor dar
> se comporta identic.
> El recomanda cenzura, precum politicienii de care se plinge.
> Dana Catona, fiind o prietena ... lantul slabiciunilor -> coruptie.
>
> Perjovschi se plinge ca bugetul icr a fost taiat de 'hoti', oameni
> 'corupti etc,
> dar nu se uita la 'big picture' - romania/eastern europe is bankrupt.
>
> Perjovschi, precum multi alti 'artisti', este un salariat, nu artist.
> This is not insult - it's a fact.
> An artist doesn't need the state. S/he serves Art.
>
>
> Bunul simt takes first place on a personal level. That isn't what
> this 'discussions' list is.
> Not when one is bombarded non-stop with reklame from salariati who
> could care less
> whom they reach.
>
> It is highly comical that one is insulted by 'polemics'  and not by
> the non-stop mindless reklame,
> when non-stop mindless reklame constitute the ultimate invalidation
> of one's humanity.
> It is an inverse censorship.
>
> It is incredibly ironic that having tasted communism, and apparently
> opposing the communist censorship,
> you fully embrace the capitalist forms of censorship. And sometimes
> not only embrace, but support and recommend,
> as in the case of perjovschi and catona.
>
> Some of you are of the impression that western democracy is superior
> - less polemics, more non-stop 'civilized' reklame,
> ie. less personal interaction (which at times is offensive), more
> impersonal robotics, and dehumanization.
>
> You should not be concerned by someone disagreeing or even insulting
> you - both still constitute a recognition of your humanity.
> You should be concerned by the faceless, sanitary non-stop reklame,
> censorship and reverse censorship that has been
> adopted by this 'discussion' list and romanian democracy as a whole,
> which is yet an improved permutation of communism
> and the dehumanization that it entails.
>
> In his work perjovschi agrees with this. In his life, however,  he is
> one of the perpetrators, much as the politicians he deplores.
> He will be an artist when his work and his life lose their individual
> borders and become one.
>
> In the interim he can follow the politicians and cut his budget.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nettime-ro mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro
> -->
> arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/
>


_______________________________________________
Nettime-ro mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro
-->
arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/