bazis on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:26:23 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Nettime-ro] limbajul pe nettime-ro |
Tu |f|...3 Nu ai un nume? Bine ca ai opinie si publici pe nettime dar nu trebuie sa-ti fie rusine... si sa te ascunzi. Eu cred ca asta e o prostie. BERSZAN Zsolt Quoting | f | | | | 3 <[email protected]>: >> el stiute) ,personaj cu care am avut si eu personal "o polemica" la >> un moment >> dat,DIN ACELEASI MOTIVE,dar am sfarsit "prieteni" in sensul >> civilizat al >> cuvantului,semn ca omul mai are inca o farama de bun simt pe care >> contez si de >> aceasta data. >> >> toate cele bune, >> >> NadiRa > > > Depinde ce consideri polemica. De multe ori acest remarcabil 'bun > simt' se scrie bun simt dar se pronunta Coruptie, > ceea ce nu reprezinta o problema la nivel personal, dar la nivel > disciplinar este o problema de care defapt va plingeti. > > Din punctul de vedere al politicienilor si al oamenilor 'obisnuiti' > perjovschi are lipsa de bun simt. > > Perjovschi si 'alti' artisti se pling de coruptia politicienilor dar > se comporta identic. > El recomanda cenzura, precum politicienii de care se plinge. > Dana Catona, fiind o prietena ... lantul slabiciunilor -> coruptie. > > Perjovschi se plinge ca bugetul icr a fost taiat de 'hoti', oameni > 'corupti etc, > dar nu se uita la 'big picture' - romania/eastern europe is bankrupt. > > Perjovschi, precum multi alti 'artisti', este un salariat, nu artist. > This is not insult - it's a fact. > An artist doesn't need the state. S/he serves Art. > > > Bunul simt takes first place on a personal level. That isn't what > this 'discussions' list is. > Not when one is bombarded non-stop with reklame from salariati who > could care less > whom they reach. > > It is highly comical that one is insulted by 'polemics' and not by > the non-stop mindless reklame, > when non-stop mindless reklame constitute the ultimate invalidation > of one's humanity. > It is an inverse censorship. > > It is incredibly ironic that having tasted communism, and apparently > opposing the communist censorship, > you fully embrace the capitalist forms of censorship. And sometimes > not only embrace, but support and recommend, > as in the case of perjovschi and catona. > > Some of you are of the impression that western democracy is superior > - less polemics, more non-stop 'civilized' reklame, > ie. less personal interaction (which at times is offensive), more > impersonal robotics, and dehumanization. > > You should not be concerned by someone disagreeing or even insulting > you - both still constitute a recognition of your humanity. > You should be concerned by the faceless, sanitary non-stop reklame, > censorship and reverse censorship that has been > adopted by this 'discussion' list and romanian democracy as a whole, > which is yet an improved permutation of communism > and the dehumanization that it entails. > > In his work perjovschi agrees with this. In his life, however, he is > one of the perpetrators, much as the politicians he deplores. > He will be an artist when his work and his life lose their individual > borders and become one. > > In the interim he can follow the politicians and cut his budget. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nettime-ro mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro > --> > arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/ > _______________________________________________ Nettime-ro mailing list [email protected] http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro --> arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/